One of the fundamental mistakes people make is in believing, despite all evidence to the contrary, that public opinion has any effect on public policy. That's why they continue to believe in voting, protests, and other ways of "making your voice heard." They make the same mistake, as you pointed out, in thinking that "if we just get good people in" or "if we just show them what we really want" then they can change the Democratic party from within. Most analysis I hear from anyone, regardless of views, is still rooted in that false assumption and thus never gets anywhere.
The ICC was created to arrest African presidents who stepped out of line. It should not exist. And the US is not even a member. Just like FARA is a tool to sick the FBI on political adversaries. Example: UHURU 3 and Scott Ritter. Neither will ever be used against Israhell bcz they are above International Law. So we need to support anti-colonial movements because they are canceling the Colonial contracts.
Why does this matter? The point here isn't gassing up the ICC. The ICC is context, yes, but it's not context that affects the point. It's not actually helpful to go down every single hallway in the building.
One of the fundamental mistakes people make is in believing, despite all evidence to the contrary, that public opinion has any effect on public policy. That's why they continue to believe in voting, protests, and other ways of "making your voice heard." They make the same mistake, as you pointed out, in thinking that "if we just get good people in" or "if we just show them what we really want" then they can change the Democratic party from within. Most analysis I hear from anyone, regardless of views, is still rooted in that false assumption and thus never gets anywhere.
New York could prosper if it acted like a city state. Find out who its true citizens are and provide for them.
The ICC was created to arrest African presidents who stepped out of line. It should not exist. And the US is not even a member. Just like FARA is a tool to sick the FBI on political adversaries. Example: UHURU 3 and Scott Ritter. Neither will ever be used against Israhell bcz they are above International Law. So we need to support anti-colonial movements because they are canceling the Colonial contracts.
Why does this matter? The point here isn't gassing up the ICC. The ICC is context, yes, but it's not context that affects the point. It's not actually helpful to go down every single hallway in the building.